In her news analysis “Rice’s Way: Restraint in Quest for Peace,” Helene Cooper focuses on Condoleezza Rice’s differing approach to the Middle East peace process than that of her predecessors. Cooper argues that as opposed to the former Secretaries of State, Rice’s approach to Middle East diplomacy is far more restrained as it consists of pushing Israel as well as President Bush only so far, while “putting off the big, hard fights until the end.” This strategy has won her considerable respect, as even some of her strongest critics believe she is moving in the right direction in the quest for peace. This article also comments on President Bush’s actions towards the debate over the formation of a Palestinian state as besides offering to aid for the Palestinian refugees, he mostly sided with Israel and does not give much to the Palestinians in return. Foreign policy specialists say that if Rice wants to be successful in the peace process she will have to get President Bush to weigh less on Israel’s side.
All in all, this article judges Rice as “quite tough” when pushing for foreign policy in her own way. Though it is less forceful than that of her predecessors, all sides agree that “there would have been no decision for the United States to re-engage in peacemaking were it not for Ms. Rice who made eight trips to Israel in the past year.” As compared to the other Secretaries of State before her, David Welch, the assistant Secretary of State for Near East affairs comments that “each one has a different style” as they each have their own way of doing things. By approaching the peacemaking process within the Middle East with an “encouraging” instead of “directive” mindset, Rice has achieved a lot compared to the leaders before her.